On 16.10.2023 13.53, Ed Maste wrote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 13:35, György Pásztor wrote:
Hi Glen,
The new betas broke the functionality to boot from ventoy.
Unfortunately the way Ventoy handles FreeBSD booting is somewhat
fragile and this sort of breakage is not surprising. I suspect the
On 10/24/23 20:03, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 11:06, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
This is a regression of forms... I have been using ventoy to boot FreeBSD
since 12 or so and this is the first I have heard of a failure to boot
FreeBSD with Ventoy, so my ask is, what changed in
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 11:06, Rodney W. Grimes
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a regression of forms... I have been using ventoy to boot FreeBSD
> > since 12 or so and this is the first I have heard of a failure to boot
> > FreeBSD with Ventoy, so my ask is, what changed in FreeBSD that broke
> > it
ventoy has only been working with freebsd since 12 or so, it was not
working before since I started using ventoy. Also ventoy won't boot the
new devuan release, for example. ventoy has to jump through hoops to get
some things to boot, so give it some time I guess.
On 10/23/23 11:06, Rodney W.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 11:06, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>
> This is a regression of forms... I have been using ventoy to boot FreeBSD
> since 12 or so and this is the first I have heard of a failure to boot
> FreeBSD with Ventoy, so my ask is, what changed in FreeBSD that broke
> it booting in
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 13:46, Gy?rgy P?sztor
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am interested in looking for a way to make Ventoy support more
> >> reliable, but that will not happen for 14.0.
> >
> > Is it depending on Ventoy?
>
> Yes, Ventoy needs to be updated for newer FreeBSD releases. For more info,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 13:46, György Pásztor wrote:
>
>> I am interested in looking for a way to make Ventoy support more
>> reliable, but that will not happen for 14.0.
>
> Is it depending on Ventoy?
Yes, Ventoy needs to be updated for newer FreeBSD releases. For more info, see:
On 10/16/23 9:54 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 00:11, Cameron Katri wrote:
The FreeBSD-14.0-BETA5-arm64-aarch64-zfs.raw.xz (maybe others, I didn't
check) has a rc.conf with a ton of repeated lines. I tried looking at
why this would be, but the release scripts to create this image
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 00:11, Cameron Katri wrote:
>
> The FreeBSD-14.0-BETA5-arm64-aarch64-zfs.raw.xz (maybe others, I didn't
> check) has a rc.conf with a ton of repeated lines. I tried looking at
> why this would be, but the release scripts to create this image went
> right over my head.
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 13:35, György Pásztor wrote:
>
> Hi Glen,
>
> The new betas broke the functionality to boot from ventoy.
Unfortunately the way Ventoy handles FreeBSD booting is somewhat
fragile and this sort of breakage is not surprising. I suspect the
Ventoy authors will have to release
On 10/6/23 18:41, Glen Barber wrote:
The fifth BETA build of the 14.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
=== Virtual Machine Disk Images ===
VM disk images are available for the amd64, i386, and aarch64
architectures. Disk images may be downloaded from the following URL
(or any of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The fifth BETA build of the 14.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
Installation images are available for:
o 14.0-BETA5 amd64 GENERIC
o 14.0-BETA5 i386 GENERIC
o 14.0-BETA5 powerpc GENERIC
o 14.0-BETA5 powerpc64 GENERIC64
o 14.0-BETA5
12 matches
Mail list logo
