On 20.02.2013 17:43, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 16.02.2013 12:07, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> On 14-02-2013 20:37, Joel Dahl wrote:
>>> On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> On 09-02-2013
On 16.02.2013 12:07, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 14-02-2013 20:37, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote:
On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> How long ago
On 14-02-2013 20:37, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote:
> > > On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
> > > > On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > > How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get
On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote:
> > On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
> > > On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get full dmesg? I don't
> > > > think that "PREVENT
On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
> > On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get full dmesg? I don't
> > > think that "PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL" should cause device drop. "No
> > >
On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get full dmesg? I don't
> > think that "PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL" should cause device drop. "No
> > sense data present" also doesn't look right.
>
> As I mentione
On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote:
> How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get full dmesg? I don't
> think that "PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL" should cause device drop. "No
> sense data present" also doesn't look right.
As I mentioned earlier, I've tried several HEAD snapshots. This
On 09.02.2013 12:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 10:26:59 Joel Dahl wrote:
>> On 09-02-2013 8:32, Joel Dahl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I suspect something is broken with memsticks built from HEAD. I noticed
>>> that I couldn't boot the latest HEAD (amd64) memstick snapsho
On Saturday 09 February 2013 10:26:59 Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 09-02-2013 8:32, Joel Dahl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suspect something is broken with memsticks built from HEAD. I noticed
> > that I couldn't boot the latest HEAD (amd64) memstick snapshot on two
> > machines (Lenovo X220 and HP ProLiant
On 09-02-2013 8:32, Joel Dahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suspect something is broken with memsticks built from HEAD. I noticed that I
> couldn't boot the latest HEAD (amd64) memstick snapshot on two machines
> (Lenovo X220 and HP ProLiant ML350 G5). Trying snapshots from the FreeBSD.org
> FTP or allbsd.o
Hi,
I suspect something is broken with memsticks built from HEAD. I noticed that I
couldn't boot the latest HEAD (amd64) memstick snapshot on two machines
(Lenovo X220 and HP ProLiant ML350 G5). Trying snapshots from the FreeBSD.org
FTP or allbsd.org makes no difference.
It boots fine until mount
11 matches
Mail list logo