Hi,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Grooms mgro...@shrew.net wrote:
On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25,
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried to integrate this patch
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Grooms mgro...@shrew.net wrote:
On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014
I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available. On a friend's
advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and 32Gig of
RAM. I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my
other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault ben.perra...@gmail.com
wrote:
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new
issues or unknowns what so
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in mind.
I'll guess that
On 16-10-2014 5:00, Anish Gupta wrote:
Hi all,
The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD.
This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD
processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD
processor since 2010 will have the features
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or
unknowns what so ever. Everything that worked before still works now ( and a
few bugs from fixed from HEAD ).
Thus, I have gone ahead and pushed r273182 w/ Neel’s patch out to about 80 of
the assorted AMD boxes in
Fantastic news! Greatly appreciated.
-Matthew
On Oct 15, 2014 10:00 PM, Anish Gupta akgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD.
This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD
processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware
10 matches
Mail list logo
