On 03.05.22 19:08, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Florian Smeets wrote:
F> On 23.04.22 01:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
F> >Hi Florian,
F> >
F> > here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
F> > yet committing it, it might be not final.
F>
F>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Florian Smeets wrote:
F> On 23.04.22 01:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
F> >Hi Florian,
F> >
F> > here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
F> > yet committing it, it might be not final.
F>
F> yes, the patch resolves the issue. There
On 23.04.22 01:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi Florian,
here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
yet committing it, it might be not final.
Hi Gleb,
yes, the patch resolves the issue. There is just one SYN packet, and it
gets a reply immediately.
Thanks,
Florian
> On 23. Apr 2022, at 02:24, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 01:54:25AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> M> > here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
> M> > yet committing it, it might be not final.
> M>
> M> when I was looking at the code,
> On 23. Apr 2022, at 01:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
> yet committing it, it might be not final.
Hi Gleb,
when I was looking at the code, I was also wondering if it would make
more sense to check for M_LOOP.
Michael,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 01:54:25AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
M> > here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
M> > yet committing it, it might be not final.
M>
M> when I was looking at the code, I was also wondering if it would make
M> more sense to check for
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 09:19:57AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
M> > Michael, can you please confirm or decline that you see the packets
M> > that are dropped when you tcpdump on lo0?
M>
M> All the jails are aliased to share a single bridge interface. That
M> results in the route to each jail
Hi Florian,
here is a patch that should help with the IPv6 problem. I'm not
yet committing it, it might be not final.
--
Gleb Smirnoff
diff --git a/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c b/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c
index 3a13d2a9dc7..625de6d3657 100644
--- a/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c
+++
On 4/16/22 01:22, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi Florian, Hi Michael,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 06:11:13PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
M> >> I can reproduce this locally, will try to figure out what is going on.
M> >> If you can bisect it, it would be great.
M> >
M> > Found the culprit
On 16.04.22 07:22, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi Florian, Hi Michael,
Hi Gleb,
thanks for looking into it.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 06:11:13PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
M> >
M> > Found the culprit 1817be481b8703ae86730b151a6f49cc3022930f. And indeed
M> > toggling
Hi Florian, Hi Michael,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 06:11:13PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
M> >> I can reproduce this locally, will try to figure out what is going on.
M> >> If you can bisect it, it would be great.
M> >
M> > Found the culprit 1817be481b8703ae86730b151a6f49cc3022930f. And indeed
> On 16. Apr 2022, at 00:05, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>> On 15. Apr 2022, at 23:39, Florian Smeets wrote:
>>
>> On 15.04.22 21:24, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 15. Apr 2022, at 20:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP
On 4/15/22 17:39, Florian Smeets wrote:
On 15.04.22 21:24, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 15. Apr 2022, at 20:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP connections on main. I
have been seeing this for a couple of months at least. pkg upgr on my
webserver
> On 15. Apr 2022, at 23:39, Florian Smeets wrote:
>
> On 15.04.22 21:24, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> On 15. Apr 2022, at 20:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP connections on main. I have
>>> been seeing this for a couple of
On 15.04.22 21:24, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 15. Apr 2022, at 20:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP connections on main. I have been
seeing this for a couple of months at least. pkg upgr on my webserver hosting
the pkg repo is very slow, all
> On 15. Apr 2022, at 20:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
>
> [bcc to net@ for wider exposure]
>
> Hi,
>
> there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP connections on main. I have
> been seeing this for a couple of months at least. pkg upgr on my webserver
> hosting the pkg repo is very slow, all
[bcc to net@ for wider exposure]
Hi,
there seems to be an issue with local IPv6 TCP connections on main. I
have been seeing this for a couple of months at least. pkg upgr on my
webserver hosting the pkg repo is very slow, all other hosts can connect
to the pkg repo just fine. So IPv6
17 matches
Mail list logo
