On 10/08/12 04:04, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
David and Michael,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> > On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> >> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
G> >> more likely)?
G> >
G> > I reverted r241245
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:04:47PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> David and Michael,
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> G> > On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> G> >> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
> G> >> more likely
David and Michael,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> > On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> >> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
G> >> more likely)?
G> >
G> > I reverted r241245 and the messages went away,
Can you please
David and Michael,
can you please build a kernel with attached patch and options KDB,
and report what's the trace is.
Unfortunately my iwn(4) is running on amd64, so I can reproduce
exactly your case.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
Index: i386/i386/in_cksum.c
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 01:51:20PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
M> On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
M> > Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
M> > more likely)?
M>
M> I reverted r241245 and the messages went away,
I'll handle that. Sorry for breakage.
--
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Michael Butler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
>> more likely)?
>
> I reverted r241245 and the messages went away,
>
>>
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:43 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:03:04AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> ...
>> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
>> more likely)?
>>
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
> more likely)?
I reverted r241245 and the messages went away,
> Did you rebuild all of your modules, and (for David) are you
> runnin
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:03:04AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> ...
> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
> more likely)?
>
>
> r241245 | glebius | 2012-10-06 03:02:11 -0700 (Sat, 06 Oct 201
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Butler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/07/12 11:11, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> I started seeing these messages spewed (to both console &
>> /var/log/messages) following an update from:
>>
>> FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 10.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/07/12 11:11, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I started seeing these messages spewed (to both console &
> /var/log/messages) following an update from:
>
> FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #697 241222M:
> Fri Oct 5 05:32:
I started seeing these messages spewed (to both console &
/var/log/messages) following an update from:
FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #697 241222M:
Fri Oct 5 05:32:19 PDT 2012
r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
to
FreeBSD g1-227.c
12 matches
Mail list logo