On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 10:40:03AM +0930, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
docs/7791 is of the opinion that ipf(1) should be moved to ipf(8), to
(among other things) be consistent with ipfw(8).
Anyone care to comment one way or the other?
Definitely.
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
docs/7791 is of the opinion that ipf(1) should be moved to ipf(8), to
(among other things) be consistent with ipfw(8).
Anyone care to comment one way or the other?
Definitely.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe