On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Dan Moschuk wrote:
> Oops! I've just committed the fix.
No sweat! We're all busy. I'm just glad to see it done. It's
something I've wanted for a long time.
> It probably should be NO_UUCP, but no
> one seems to want to make a final decision on the NOFOO vs. NO_FO
| > I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway
| > if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are
| > affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped
| > around the NOUUCP knob?
|
| I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message for this w
Ray Kohler wrote:
>
> I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway
> if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are
> affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped
> around the NOUUCP knob?
I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message
I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway
if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are
affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped
around the NOUUCP knob?
--
Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Commitment, n.:
Commitment can be il
