On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have
On 03/01/12 09:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
ports is 3.0
I think this is just right post to intrude :)
I'm developing software, and making it in pretty good IDE - Intellij Idea.
There's community and pro version.
What good in this company - it gives access to Pro version for not-small
open source projects.
I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with
something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request
for open source license.
Are you requesting someone to create FreeBSD port for this
2012/3/1 Eygene Ryabinkin r...@freebsd.org
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with
something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling
request
for open source license.
Are you
On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to
configure for use with
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
Am 23.02.2012 12:22, schrieb O. Hartmann:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
To: Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com
Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ports FreeBSD
freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Sun, February 26, 2012 4:48:36 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated
version in the
On 23-02-2012 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA,
I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the
focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks
is incapable of being easily adapted to
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this
I don't know how well it would suit your purpose, but you could always
try emacs-ide (at http://gna.org/projects/emacs-ide/ )
--
Igor M. :-)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many
of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE,
but it is marked broken on FreeBSD.
I'm using kdevelop-kde4 and
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried
You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse.
- --
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
... though I wouldn't necessarily recommend it.
Dan.
From: Martin Schütte li...@mschuette.name
Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:45:42 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking
for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more
general niftiness. Visual Slickedit?
On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O.
Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking
for, rather than just
.
From: Jan Mikkelsenj...@transactionware.com
To: O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de
Cc: Current FreeBSDfreebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern
I don't disagree. I was disagreeing with the notion that Unix is an IDE.
From: Quentin Schwerkolt develloper.u...@hotmail.fr
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 9:44:50 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Ok, but I think
21 matches
Mail list logo
