Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
> :
> : http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
> :
> : Search for "C++":
> :
> : ISO/IEC 14882:199
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
>
> > The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
>
> Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
> it have a proper title? I
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: That's cool. I can get the electronic version for only $18. What
: format is it in?
Never mind. Found that it is in PDF. Now where did I put that credit
card...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Luevelsmeyer writes:
> : What you want is "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages -- C"
>
> In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
>
> Warner
I don't talk C++, but I think you'll want "ISO/IEC 14882:1998
Programming languag
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: > In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
:
: http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
:
: Search for "C++":
:
: ISO/IEC 14882:1998 Programming languages - C++ $ 305
:
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
Search for "C++":
ISO/IEC 14882:1998 Programming languages - C++ $ 305
ISO/IEC 14882-1998 Information Technology - Programming Languages - C++
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Luevelsmeyer writes:
: What you want is "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages -- C"
In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
>
> > The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
>
> Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
> it have a proper title? I need this one.
What you w
On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
> The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
it have a proper title? I need this one.
Thanks,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
David Malone wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > From the C99 draft (n869.txt):
>
> Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up
> cash to get a copy?
The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Draft vers
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> From the C99 draft (n869.txt):
Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up
cash to get a copy?
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote:
> > It actually worked! Now I will go and see what this uintptr_t
> > actually is :-)
>
> Its an unsigned integer type which is the same size as a pointer (i.e. its
> safe to cast a pointer to uintptr_t without
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote:
>
> On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> >> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> >> > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
> >> > > that added -W
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote:
> You can suppress the warning if you cast to uintptr_t first. Pretty ugly
> though.
For (almost) full uglyness and correctness, you have to cast to
"volatile void *" first, then back via "void *":
#define unvolstructfoop(sfp) \
((struct foo *)(void *
On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>
>> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>> > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
>> > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
>> >
>> > Or we should
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <
>said:
>
> > So does:
>
> > bzero((void *)&trash, sizeof(junk_t));
>
> > So, how do I make everyone happy?
>
> Put a comment on that line indicating that a warning is expected.
Someone's ie driver has lines like this. This does not make me hap
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
> > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
> >
> > Or we should just delete it from the options.
>
> Ugh.
On 09-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>> > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
>> > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
>>
>> Or we should just delete it from the options.
>
> Ugh. I don't ac
On 10-May-00 Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
>>
>> Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose.
>> What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a
>> volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort
>> of conditional
At 7:08 PM -0400 5/9/00, Simon Shapiro wrote:
>Given:
>
>typedef struct junk {
>...
>} junk_t
>
>volatile junk_t trash;
>
>What I want to do is zero out trash.
>
>bzero(trash, sizeof(junk_t));
>
>produces a warning about loss of volatility.
>So, how do I make everyone happy?
Write a 'bzer
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose.
> What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a
> volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort
> of conditional volatility exclusion.
You can however use a
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
> > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
>
> Or we should just delete it from the options.
Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a val
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
> that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it from the options.
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. Or write your own,
suboptimal, bzero code.
> Hi Again,
>
> Since you were so kind to me, I will impose another
> one on you (the previous answers were _all_ correct! )
>
> G
<
said:
> So does:
> bzero((void *)&trash, sizeof(junk_t));
> So, how do I make everyone happy?
Put a comment on that line indicating that a warning is expected.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The f
Hi Again,
Since you were so kind to me, I will impose another
one on you (the previous answers were _all_ correct! )
Given:
typedef struct junk {
...
} junk_t
volatile junk_t trash;
What I want to do is zero out trash.
bzero(trash, sizeof(junk_t));
produces a warning about loss of v
26 matches
Mail list logo
