FYI, I missed that this fix has already gone into illumos:
commit 5253393b09789ec67bec153b866d7285a1cf1645
Author: Matthew Ahrens mahr...@delphix.com
Date: Fri Aug 30 02:19:35 2013
4082 zfs receive gets EFBIG from dmu_tx_hold_free()
Reviewed by: Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.com
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:32:26AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Indeed, probably a bad key combo in vi :).
I'm reverting r253821 and r254753 (the second one was supposingly fixing
the first one) and recompiling my kernel.
I will let you know.
So far so good, I've been able to
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
dataset.
For the background, I synchronize a zfs dataset every couple of minutes
using zfs send/receive.
I think I recently got a panic (I'm running
@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
dataset.
For the background, I
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
works after that?
Actually, I already rolled back my kernel
- Original Message -
From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
Might want to try back out that change and see if
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
Might want to try back out that change and see if
- Original Message -
From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
Hi,
I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
dataset.
For the background, I synchronize a zfs dataset every couple of minutes
using zfs send/receive.
I think I recently got a panic (I'm running mav@'s geom direct dispatch
patch) which probably happen at a bad time and
11 matches
Mail list logo
