New version of patch incorporating most of the Brucifications:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vaccess.patch
Comments & tests please.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
N
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > Please test and review this patch:
> >
> > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
>
> Looks fine to me except vop_stdaccess() itself.
vop_stdaccess() is badly named. It is not a vop f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Boris Pop
ov writes:
>On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> Please test and review this patch:
>>
>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
>
> Looks fine to me except vop_stdaccess() itself. Since VREAD,
>VWRITE and VEXEC bits are caref
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Please test and review this patch:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
>
> This patch creates a centralized function "vop_stdaccess()" which
> does the "canonical" permission check on a vnode.
>
> This code was duplicated in 5
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Please test and review this patch:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
Looks fine to me except vop_stdaccess() itself. Since VREAD,
VWRITE and VEXEC bits are carefully layed this function can be rewritten
to use single shif
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000816 14:52] wrote:
>
> Please test and review this patch:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
Not tested, but looks good, I'd like to see it applied.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
Please test and review this patch:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
This patch creates a centralized function "vop_stdaccess()" which
does the "canonical" permission check on a vnode.
This code was duplicated in 5 filesystems and morphed in a 6th.
Files touched:
Index:
