On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > There I go reply to all... <sigh> > > > > > > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the > > > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy > > > here. > > > > Agree, I don't see any use in supporting upgrades without going through > > 4.x-STABLE first. > > It's nice that you guys are in agreement on that fact, but perhaps you'd > like to do something constructive like to look at and review the patches?
Done. The patches look good. > Avoiding the install of a new make during a build is highly desirable, > even if you don't believe in updating from old RELENG_4. Agreed (it's so nice to be in agreement :-) A regular buildworld failed even when upgrading a less-than-a-week old -current. The removal of anything we install as part of a build phase is good and not tied to the (version) distance of the upgrade. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
