On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.
Some of
Am 09.08.2013 19:27 UTC+2, schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired behaviour in the
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:59:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
If I understand bapt@ right, this should be all what is needed:
--- Makefile.orig 2013-06-20 17:48:12.0 +0200
+++ Makefile 2013-08-09 20:56:36.0 +0200
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
LICENSE= GPLv2
Am 07.08.2013 21:01 (UTC+1) schrieb Rainer Hurling:
Thanks, Bapt, for answering.
Am 07.08.2013 19:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.
Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar
messages about an ld problem (invalid DSO for symbol 'xxx' definition),
followed by
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.
Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar
messages about
Thanks, Bapt, for answering.
Am 07.08.2013 19:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.