Re: Problem loading 2.x kernel with new bootblocks

1999-01-21 Thread Robert Nordier
Peter Jeremy wrote: > Mike Smith wrote: > >> The kernel has been built with gcc-2.8.1 -O2. > > > >Please rebuild with the system compiler and -O at most. > > It makes no difference. The kernel loads and runs happily from the > old bootloader, but crashes with /boot/loader. (I disabled my > gcc-

Re: Problem loading 2.x kernel with new bootblocks

1999-01-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
Mike Smith wrote: >> The kernel has been built with gcc-2.8.1 -O2. > >Please rebuild with the system compiler and -O at most. It makes no difference. The kernel loads and runs happily from the old bootloader, but crashes with /boot/loader. (I disabled my gcc-2.8.1, changed make.conf to -O, re-r

Re: Problem loading 2.x kernel with new bootblocks [Re: Experiences with aout-to-elf and new bootblocks]

1999-01-21 Thread Mike Smith
> The kernel has been built with gcc-2.8.1 -O2. Please rebuild with the system compiler and -O at most. We're hard-pressed enough as it is to support our own software without introducing complete unknowns into the equation. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you

Problem loading 2.x kernel with new bootblocks [Re: Experiences with aout-to-elf and new bootblocks]

1999-01-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
Splitting the thread... "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: >> /boot/loader could load my 2.x kernel (although it happily handled > ^^ >You mean "could not", right? That's correct. >Is it kzipped, your 2.x kernel? (Is there any detail about it that >you think it is not relevant? :-)