Re: Problems tuning kmem_map on 5.1-REL box.

2003-06-19 Thread David Schultz
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003, Peter Losher wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, David Schultz wrote: > > > To allow the kmem_map to exceed 200 MB, you'll also need to tweak > > VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX to (for example) '(1024 * 1024 * 1024)'. BTW, > > the formula, which I stole from vmparam.h, is: > > > > min(max(VM_KM

Re: Problems tuning kmem_map on 5.1-REL box.

2003-06-19 Thread Peter Losher
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, David Schultz wrote: > To allow the kmem_map to exceed 200 MB, you'll also need to tweak > VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX to (for example) '(1024 * 1024 * 1024)'. BTW, > the formula, which I stole from vmparam.h, is: > > min(max(VM_KMEM_SIZE, Physical memory/VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE), VM_KMEM_SI

Re: Problems tuning kmem_map on 5.1-REL box.

2003-06-18 Thread David Schultz
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003, Peter Losher wrote: > Hi - > > If this sort of question is better asked on a more specialized list > @freebsd.org, please let me know. (Since 5.1 is still considered a > developmental release, one doesn't know if either -current or -stable > would be more appropriate. So I a

Problems tuning kmem_map on 5.1-REL box.

2003-06-17 Thread Peter Losher
Hi - If this sort of question is better asked on a more specialized list @freebsd.org, please let me know. (Since 5.1 is still considered a developmental release, one doesn't know if either -current or -stable would be more appropriate. So I am sending it to -current. So, I recently put a Quad-X