On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:16:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
> (kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
> adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
> using more than 100% C
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:08:24AM +0200, Ian Freislich wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
> > (kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
> > adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is alleg
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
> (kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
> adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
> using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output)
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output) the
processes that are sleep
