Re: RAIDZ capacity (was ZFS version 15 committed to head)

2010-07-18 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 17.07.2010 um 16:30 schrieb Marco van Lienen: I also posted the example of creating a test raidz pool based on 3 65Mb files. On osol there is more available space being reported by 'zfs list' on that test raidz pool When I created a similar test raidz pool also based on 3 65Mb files, 'zfs

RAIDZ capacity (was ZFS version 15 committed to head)

2010-07-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 17.07.2010 um 12:51 schrieb Marco van Lienen: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the following to the -current list: Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: # zpool list pool1 NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT pool1 5.44T

Re: RAIDZ capacity (was ZFS version 15 committed to head)

2010-07-17 Thread Marco van Lienen
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 01:04:52PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the following to the -current list: I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not? That would imply that my friend running osol