On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:30:17AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Leif Neland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010219 08:54] wrote:
We all know: -current is bleeding edge, expect it to break at random. Don't run it
if you don't know how to fix it.
-stable is for production, it works all the time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leif Neland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:55 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Do we need a 3. level between stable and cuurent?
We all know: -current is bleeding edge, expect it to break at
"oldfart@gtonet" wrote:
-RELEASE, I thought, is for production. Although, it's true, -STABLE rarely
has a stop.
Nope, -STABLE is for production, -RELEASE is for installing immediately
prior to upgrading it to -STABLE. X.X-STABLE = X.X-RELEASE + fixes +
carefully selected stuff that has been
I stand corrected...
-Original Message-
From: Dermot McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG
Subject: Re: Do we need a 3. level between stable and cuurent?
"oldfart@gtonet&q
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:22:43 +
Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DM Nope, -STABLE is for production, -RELEASE is for installing immediately
Indeed, in fact there has been at least one release that was *not*
tagged for -STABLE (3.0).
--
Tell a computer to WIN - you lose!
* Leif Neland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010219 08:54] wrote:
We all know: -current is bleeding edge, expect it to break at random. Don't run it
if you don't know how to fix it.
-stable is for production, it works all the time.
Do we need a level in between for people who just run current for the
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:54:53 +0100, "Leif Neland" wrote:
Do we need a level in between for people who just run current for the
fun of it and for testing. So after the hardcore has tested it in
-current, they commit it to all the monkeys trying to break it, and we
then try it on n^m'
