Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-06-04 10:15 +, Matthew Gardiner wrote: > >> > > Just a quick question, what version of GCC is going to appear in FreeBSD > 5.1? I heard that it maybe GCC 3.2.3 and that GCC 3.3 (depending on its > stability) will be used for 5.2. Could someone either confirm or correct me > on this ass

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:15:41AM +1000, Matthew Gardiner wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I > >> have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building > >> HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. > >> > >> I suggest that the original

RE: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Matthew Gardiner
>> >> Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I >> have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building >> HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. >> >> I suggest that the original poster double-check that he has RELENG_5_1 >> and not HEAD. And I do have bui

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:56:01 -0700 "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I > have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building > HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. > > I suggest that the original po

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300 > Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make > > buildworld compiles > > a while and then stops with: > > > > Question

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

2003-06-04 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300 Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make > buildworld compiles > a while and then stops with: > > Question is if this is supported and if yes, what should I do > differently? > > Pete Got