Re: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

2003-07-16 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Now after resetting the machine which was hung by sysinstall it claims that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5 disks was absent (see dmesg below) Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is definatley not) and allows me to

RE: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

2003-07-16 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Lukas Ertl wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Now after resetting the machine which was hung by sysinstall it claims that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5 disks was absent (see dmesg below) Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is

Re: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

2003-07-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:47:25AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Now after resetting the machine which was hung by sysinstall it claims that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5 disks was absent (see dmesg below) Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is definatley

Re: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

2003-07-15 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Now after resetting the machine which was hung by sysinstall it claims that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5 disks was absent (see dmesg below) mirrored by what? Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is definatley

RE: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

2003-07-15 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Julian Elischer wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Now after resetting the machine which was hung by sysinstall it claims that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5 disks was absent (see dmesg below) mirrored by what? By ata. It is reognized as ar0 after setting it up in