Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2014-06-28 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
TB --- 2014-06-28 16:10:48 - /usr/bin/make -B buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT I'm fixing this one shortly and a few others. Just waiting for my make universe to complete. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-06-19 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-06-19 07:27, Tim Kientzle wrote: stage 4.2: building libraries stage 4.3: make dependencies stage 4.4: building everything [...] /src/usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr/../../../../contrib/apr/include/apr_ring.h:183:34: note: expanded from macro 'APR_RING_PREV' #define APR_RING_PREV(ep, link)

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-06-18 Thread Alie Tan
This revision causing the issue http://freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r251856 I have to revert the revision to solve the issue On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:23 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.orgwrote: TB --- 2013-06-17 22:50:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-06-18 Thread Tim Kientzle
stage 4.2: building libraries stage 4.3: make dependencies stage 4.4: building everything [...] /src/usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr/../../../../contrib/apr/include/apr_ring.h:183:34: note: expanded from macro 'APR_RING_PREV' #define APR_RING_PREV(ep, link) (ep)-link.prev

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-03-23 Thread Glen Barber
sbruno already fixed this. Glen On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 02:48:39AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: [...] pgphY5LCEEuwB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-03-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed! Adrian On 8 March 2013 20:18, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2013-03-09 01:30:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-03-09 01:30:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-01-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, November 09, 2012 05:47:43 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. It's just a personal box.. on a residential

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com: Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's headlong rush development model, I subscribed to various BSD mailing lists to see what +else was out there. I considered FreeBSD at the time - there was a neverending avalanche of [head

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote: Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's headlong rush development model, I subscribed to various BSD mailing lists to see what else was out there. I considered FreeBSD at the time - there was a neverending

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Brett
NetBSD is hit-or-miss to build successfully, more miss than hit. NetBSD supports GPT awkwardly but has no support for USB 3.0. NetBSD is rather unstable. I think I'd trust FreeBSD-current over a stable or release version of NetBSD. How does OpenBSD compare in that regard? I

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Brett
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:34:24 +1100 Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote: On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote: Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's headlong rush development model, I subscribed to various BSD mailing lists to see what else

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Doug Brewer
tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Message-ID: cag0v13tpalmdpg-8rifcjjroxz948mqzjnn1yvqz4teybjz...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. It's just a

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Doug Brewer
Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. It's just a personal box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with

[OT] Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:34:24 +1100 Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote: On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote: Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's headlong rush

Re: [OT] Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
It's a valid concern. I need to pick up my game. Adrian On 10 November 2012 08:26, Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian Chadd

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Doug Brewer
No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Fixed, sorry! adrian On 8 November 2012 15:03, FreeBSD Tinderbox

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! make tinderbox is the important point here because it uses different compile time

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 9 November 2012 07:34, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! I'm implementing a cut-down version of make universe on my development laptop. It

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Brett
Message: 11 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:34:58 +0800 From: Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org Cc: a...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org, curr...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Message-ID

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Chuck Burns
On 11/9/2012 3:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 07:34, Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com wrote: No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! I'm implementing a cut-down version of make

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Chuck Burns
On 11/9/2012 4:16 PM, Brett wrote: Message: 11 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:34:58 +0800 From: Doug Brewer brewer.d...@gmail.com To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org Cc: a...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org, curr...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote: Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. It's just a personal box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free on my

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-09 Thread Brett
No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's headlong rush development model, I subscribed to various BSD mailing lists to see what

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed, sorry! adrian On 8 November 2012 15:03, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2012-11-08 21:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-08 21:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-10-03 Thread Ian FREISLICH
FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict -prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-sh ow-option -nostdinc -I.

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed. On 20 August 2012 11:30, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-06-20 Thread Eitan Adler
On 19 June 2012 23:12, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: Stop in /src/usr.sbin/mfiutil. *** Error code 1 looks like this is my fault :( I've sent a patch to my mentor for approval which should fix this. -- Eitan Adler ___

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-06-14 Thread Warner Losh
On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:11 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: /src/sys/arm/s3c2xx0/s3c24x0_machdep.c: In function 'initarm': /src/sys/arm/s3c2xx0/s3c24x0_machdep.c:252: error: too few arguments to function 'fake_preload_metadata' Odd... This looks like a stale build. 252 no longer has that call on

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-11-27 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:08:02 GMT FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: FT /src/sys/kern/kern_proc.c:2589: error: 'KERN_PROC_PS_STRINGS' undeclared here (not in a function) FT *** Error code 1 Forgot to commit changes to sys/sysctl.h. Sorry for this. Should be fixed in r228046. -- Mikolaj Golub

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-11-18 Thread Philip Paeps
On 17 Nov 2011, at 23:31, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-11-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - cleaning the object tree TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed! Sorry. Adrian On 25 June 2011 06:12, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote: TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - cleaning the object

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-01-12 Thread Matthew Fleming
This is me, but I'm rather puzzled why it's failing. SYSCTL_UQUAD is in the sys/sysctl.h for the image we're building. And why is there a file with SYSCTL_FOO being built as a library? Any help? Thanks, matthew On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:20 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-01-12 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-01-12 23:26, Matthew Fleming wrote: This is me, but I'm rather puzzled why it's failing. SYSCTL_UQUAD is in the sys/sysctl.h for the image we're building. And why is there a file with SYSCTL_FOO being built as a library? Any help? During the build of cddl/lib/libzpool, it looks like

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-03-01 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: === usr.bin/systat (all) cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -std=gnu99 -Wno-pointer-sign -c /src/usr.bin/systat/cmds.c cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -std=gnu99 -Wno-pointer-sign -c /src/usr.bin/systat/cmdtab.c In file included from /src/usr.bin/systat/extern.h:39,