On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:25:01PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:17:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
therefore useless to test changes that
I see that here too. Maybe des missed something during his openpam upgrade?
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I upgraded frem 4.5-STABLE to 5.0-CURRENT three days ago, and it worked
fine. But since I cvsupped yesterday, a 'make buildworld' results in:
** snip snip
It dies on the depend stage, if -DNOPROFILE is used... It needs
pam_misc.h on usr.bin/su then.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that here too. Maybe des missed something during his openpam upgrade?
Ah, yes - src/lib/libpam/libpam/Makefile should have NOPROFILE=YES. I
didn't notice because I have it in my make.conf.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's why it's always a good idea to test changes with make release,
in a pristine environment.
Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
therefore useless to test changes that haven't yet been committed.
DES
--
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:17:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's why it's always a good idea to test changes with make release,
in a pristine environment.
Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
therefore
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that here too. Maybe des missed something during his openpam upgrade?
Ah, yes - src/lib/libpam/libpam/Makefile should have NOPROFILE=YES. I
didn't notice because I have it in my
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:17:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
therefore useless to test changes that haven't yet been committed.
There's such a thing as LOCAL_PATCHES since
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:25:01PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:17:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
therefore useless to test changes that
