On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:29:54AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
NetBSD builds a directory full of tools that you can later use to
incrementally build, say, 'ls' or 'cat' because one can define
USETOOLS to be 'yes' and have the make automatically pick them up when
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is FreeBSD
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:48:01PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to
be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it
seems a bit conservative to make incremental world
On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:57:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to
do crossbuilds ?
:
:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:28:09AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create
: a framework to do crossbuilds ?
:
:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create
: a framework
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
NetBSD builds a directory full of tools that you can later use to
incrementally build, say, 'ls' or 'cat' because one can define
USETOOLS to be 'yes' and have the make automatically pick them up when
rebuilding. There are a few of the details I'm a little unclear on,
Thus spake John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great
efforts to create a clean-room environment for a release. make
rerelease is quite helpful though and does do what you want to
restart a previous release. :) Also, make buildworld
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:02:20PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great
efforts to create a clean-room environment for a release. make
rerelease is quite helpful though and does do what you
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to
be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it
seems a bit conservative to make incremental world builds require
that an undocumented variable be defined. Any
14 matches
Mail list logo
