On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:30:15 +
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 14 January 2012 15:16, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Per discussion in freebsd-rc@, I have removed set_rcvar() from
rc.subr. The concept of
On 01/15/2012 00:11, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Chris, if you're working on fixing ports' rc files
Thanks for taking a look at this. FYI, all of the rc.d scripts that are
actually in the ports tree have already been fixed. The outliers at this
point are scripts that are included in the
On 15 January 2012 08:11, Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:30:15 +
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 14 January 2012 15:16, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Per discussion in
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:40:36 -0800
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/15/2012 00:11, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Chris, if you're working on fixing ports' rc files
Thanks for taking a look at this. FYI, all of the rc.d scripts that
are actually in the ports tree have already been
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:51:53 +
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
Don't thank me!
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2012-January/233843.html
Wow! Doug has been a busy boy recently! :-)
The only ones that will cause trouble are the ones provided by
upstream, but a
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 01:05:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
to make the change by hand, change this:
name=foo
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
to:
name=foo
rcvar=foo_enable
The scripts installed by net/avahi-app still use set_rcvar() because
they are included in the source.
--
Denny Lin
On 14 January 2012 11:11, Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 01:05:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
to make the change by hand, change this:
name=foo
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
to:
name=foo
rcvar=foo_enable
The scripts installed by net/avahi-app still use
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 01:05:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Per discussion in freebsd-rc@, I have removed set_rcvar() from rc.subr.
The concept of set_rcvar() was nice in theory, but the forks it creates
are a drag on the startup process, which is especially noticeable on
slower systems, such
On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Per discussion in freebsd-rc@, I have removed set_rcvar() from rc.subr.
The concept of set_rcvar() was nice in theory, but the forks it creates
are a drag on the startup process, which is especially noticeable on
slower systems, such as
On 14 January 2012 15:16, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Per discussion in freebsd-rc@, I have removed set_rcvar() from rc.subr.
The concept of set_rcvar() was nice in theory, but the forks it creates
are a drag on the startup
On 01/14/2012 06:44, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Why must the 2-argument form of set_rcvar die at the same time? It is
used very differently and does not cause unnecessary forks. Instead, it
is called in the same shell environment to define additional rc.conf
variables that have defaults and are
On 01/14/2012 07:16, Rainer Hurling wrote:
BTW, is there any reason not to set 'rcvar=${name}_enable' in all that
cases?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/2012-January/002660.html
Also, as I pointed out in my commit message, using the literal value is
a tiny bit faster, and every
On 14.01.2012 22:29 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/14/2012 07:16, Rainer Hurling wrote:
BTW, is there any reason not to set 'rcvar=${name}_enable' in all that
cases?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/2012-January/002660.html
Also, as I pointed out in my commit message, using
13 matches
Mail list logo
