On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:05:06 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote:
Please consider the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/8/23 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It
would be much more
On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:05:06 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote:
Please consider the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
I've tested it and it works OK. I got a timeout which is ~= 25ms using
2013/8/26 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
Please consider the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
I've tested it and it works OK. I got a timeout which is ~= 25ms using
the testcase provided by the user.
The only doubt I have is about the range
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:29 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:53:12 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/23 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It
would be much more important to implement high-precision timeouts for
select() and friends, if it's
On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:29 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:53:12 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/21 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Monday, August 19, 2013 11:13:02 pm Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yes! Please file a PR!
This sorta
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/21 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Monday, August 19, 2013 11:13:02 pm Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/21 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Monday,
2013/8/23 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/21
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:53:12 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov
On Monday, August 19, 2013 11:13:02 pm Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yes! Please file a PR!
This sorta implies that both are acceptable (although,
the Linux behavior seems more desirable).
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=369
No, that says
Yes! Please file a PR!
-adrian
On 19 August 2013 12:33, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Recently I was playing with small socket timeouts. setsockopt(2)
SO_RCVTIMEO and found a problem with it: if timeout is small enough
read(2) may return before timeout is actually
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yes! Please file a PR!
This sorta implies that both are acceptable (although,
the Linux behavior seems more desirable).
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=369
On 19 August 2013 12:33, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
15 matches
Mail list logo