Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-30 Thread Brian Somers
Well, this has been happening for about a year on my dev box. It's not gcc 3.1 specific. I've never gotten around to figuring out why it works on some machines. On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 19:41:51 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 11:30:48PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: The problem

Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-29 Thread Brian Somers
I've been seing this problem for ages on my dev box, but it doesn't happen on other boxes. The problem is because the glxinfo program uses CCLINK to link, but it's a c++ program. Changing the CCLINK to CXXLINK works. I have no idea why there's no problem on some machines. On Mon, 17 Jun 2002

Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 11:30:48PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: The problem is because the glxinfo program uses CCLINK to link, but it's a c++ program. Changing the CCLINK to CXXLINK works. We can't be the only ones seeing this -- surely anyone using Gcc 3.1 on their i386 (any OS) box. Has

Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-23 Thread Ying-Chieh Liao
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 12:09:14 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: make build all ok, but failed on install should I rebuild world first ? after adding -lstdc++ , it's all ok and I find that everything link with libGL* must link to stdc++, too (at least ports/x11-toolkits/gtkglarea) maybe the

Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-23 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 07:19:06PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 12:09:14 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: make build all ok, but failed on install should I rebuild world first ? after adding -lstdc++ , it's all ok It is not OK. One should NEVER be explicity adding

Re: make install failed on XFree86-4-client (with 6/10 -current)

2002-06-23 Thread Ying-Chieh Liao
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:46:25 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: It is not OK. One should NEVER be explicity adding -lstdc++. Please use the right compiler which takes care of all this for you. I dont know how to make a patch against X (it's too complex :/ ) but I do know that it works (for me