* Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Date: 2003-07-13 ]
[ w.r.t. Re: make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box ]
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
I think splitting it or making it exit after just setting variables
in the userland case is the right fix
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
In particular, newvers.sh is being run with the
current directory being ${.OBJDIR}, and ${.OBJDIR}
doesn't contain a Makefile, ...
... `make -V FOO' doesn't require a Makefile in -current. ...
A-HA!
I don't know the right way to fix
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
I think splitting it or making it exit after just setting variables
in the userland case is the right fix. ...
[it == newvers.sh]
I think you're right, but don't see a very simple way to make that
work, especially given the
Andrey Elperin wrote:
Tell me, please, is it a possible to make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box
at present ?
I see that make release stops with a such messages for a couple of days :
=== include
cd /usr/src/include; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make buildincludes;
/usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make
Tim Kientzle wrote:
Andrey Elperin wrote:
Tell me, please, is it a possible to make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box
at present ?
I see that make release stops with a such messages for a couple of days :
=== include
cd /usr/src/include; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make buildincludes;
Terry Lambert wrote:
Tim Kientzle wrote:
Andrey Elperin wrote:
Tell me, please, is it a possible to make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box
at present ?
I see that make release stops with a such messages for a couple of days :
=== include
cd /usr/src/include; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I see that make release stops with a such messages for a couple of days :
=== include
cd /usr/src/include; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make buildincludes;
/usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make installincludes
creating osreldate.h from
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
Does this damage CURRENT on CURRENT or anything like that?
Don't know, haven't had a chance to try it.
To be honest, I was never able to understand how
the previous version was supposed to work, since
the newvers.sh script was
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
Does this damage CURRENT on CURRENT or anything like that?
Don't know, haven't had a chance to try it.
To be honest, I was never able to understand how
the previous version was supposed to work, since
the
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
To be honest, I was never able to understand how
the previous version was supposed to work, since
the newvers.sh script was run with a very
odd current directory.
Looks like it was
10 matches
Mail list logo
