On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if
it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after.
Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first.
I'll poke them tomorrow, but since
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if
it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after.
Given that RC1 is already out,
On 3 November 2011 09:45, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe not the place to ask, but why are you (ie. FreeBSD folks) unable
to unleash commit to `trunk' and let only required MFC go to
`stable/9' ?
Hi,
We can. It's just that we're being nice to keep the diffs between
-HEAD and
On 10/31/2011 14:17, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider
testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it
overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes.
The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:17:28 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider
testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it
overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes.
The code is a bit messy and it's
On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate
situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and
-HEAD.
Is this work that
On 10/31/2011 17:22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate
situation of having to keep merging between the
