Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
So, to start with issue 2:
To start with the beginning:
1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the
way we would like to go? (but only it better :-)
I think we want to keep the ucontext changes. SUSv2 requires them
when SA_SIGINFO is set.
1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the
way we would like to go? (but only it better :-)
We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see
what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it
seems like we need to have
Nate Williams wrote:
1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the
way we would like to go? (but only it better :-)
We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see
what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it
seems
