Re: snapshot stability

1999-12-29 Thread Matthew Jacob
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:31:38 GMT, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > > As of right now, which would that be? The august CD snapshot release or > > the one available on the cvs servers right now? > > If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the > corner (January some

Re: snapshot stability

1999-12-29 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes: : If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the : corner (January some time). Otherwise, just inhale and prepare to : bleed. :-) I think that the January some time date may be optimistic given that we're not in featur

Re: snapshot stability

1999-12-29 Thread Donn Miller
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > I read that the VM system has been revamped and egcs is the default > compiler. Will either of these affect the average user besides larger > binaries? Actually, egcs WAS the default compiler. It is now (output of gcc -v): $ gcc -v Using builti

Re: snapshot stability

1999-12-29 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
I read that the VM system has been revamped and egcs is the default compiler. Will either of these affect the average user besides larger binaries? Also, i'm wondering if maybe i should just wait until the 4.1 release for everything to settle down... -=> jm <=- To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: snapshot stability

1999-12-29 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:31:38 GMT, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > As of right now, which would that be? The august CD snapshot release or > the one available on the cvs servers right now? If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the corner (January some time). Otherwis