Re: svn commit: r235275 - projects user

2012-05-14 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:35:59 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back. Why did you proceed? - I had a non-zero number of people tell me that it looked good. - Peter

Re: svn commit: r235275 - projects user

2012-05-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 5/14/2012 12:02 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Uli - amazed that a change to a document that apparently no one is reading can cause such a fuss. ... which is the point that several of us tried to make, and which you seem to have ignored. The problem with committers not reading the

Re: svn commit: r235275 - projects user

2012-05-13 Thread Doug Barton
When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back. Why did you proceed? Doug On 5/11/2012 9:08 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Fri May 11 16:08:51 2012 New Revision: 235275 URL: