On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
space consumed.
By default, stack for the amd64 thread is 4MB, that should be
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
space
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one running 9.0-BETA2.
I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has run flawlessly so far. I
compiled manually this very version on 9.0-BETA2. But I get the
following segfault:
Program received signal
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one running 9.0-BETA2.
I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has run flawlessly so far. I
compiled manually this very version on
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one running 9.0-BETA2.
I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:59:53 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one running 9.0-BETA2.
I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
space consumed.
Isn't it a little bit hungry? To do this on stack? Softwares
