Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-30 Thread David Taylor
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > Are you running seti, rc4, etc? Any programs that sit in the background > and consume 100% of the cpu? > I'm running KDE (using libc_r), and run setiathome and/or dnetc in the background. I've also tried killing the background tasks, but it makes litt

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-09-30 02:07 +0300, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:12, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > > > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > > > > > [.

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Aggelos Economopoulos
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:12, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading compli

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > [...] > > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in > > > Mozilla Firebird, and when logging out of GNOME 2.4 (

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Aggelos Economopoulos
On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: [...] > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in > > Mozilla Firebird, and when logging out of GNOME 2.4 (the 'background > > fade' animation brings my Athlon XP 2000+

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Peter Kadau
Hi ! > I use the /dev/sysmouse and moused, not quite sure > why but that's how I've always used my mouse (PS2 or USB) with > FreeBSD. Could this have something to do with the mouse feeling > sloppy? Hmmm, I never used moused and always /dev/psm0 in X. Still experience the same thing. Cheers Pe

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Morten Rodal
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:04:49AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > > > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-29 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Monday 29 September 2003 07:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote: > > > Morten Rodal wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote: > > > >>Morten Rodal wrote: > > > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 200

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote: > > Morten Rodal wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote: > > >>Morten Rodal wrote: > > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. > > > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is und

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Matt Douhan
On Sunday 28 September 2003 16.40, Peter Kadau wrote: > Hi ! > > > > I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CURRENT from 2 days ago, and I experience > > > the stuttering too. > > Me too, though I have to relativize this. > My configuration is UP with a pentium 4, 2.4 GHz running > gnome2, evolution, mozilla

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Peter Kadau
Hi ! > > I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CURRENT from 2 days ago, and I experience the > > stuttering too. Me too, though I have to relativize this. My configuration is UP with a pentium 4, 2.4 GHz running gnome2, evolution, mozilla and some gnome-terminals. With 4BSD, the mouse cycles through non-r

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Matteo Riondato
Il Dom, 2003-09-28 alle 15:45, Arjan van Leeuwen ha scritto: > > Ahh I tell you the other difference. I had a USB mouse when I tried ULE > > with 5.1-release and it stuttered. It's just a ps2 one on the current > > kernel where it's not stuttering. > > > > Matt. > > I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CU

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Alexander Langer
> I have not had this experience. Can you give me details of your machine > and the kind of load that causes slugishness? I'll correct it as soon as > I can identify it. Using Linux-Firebird with some Java applets shows this effect, i.e. completelly bogging down X to a unusable state. Also, it'

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote: > Morten Rodal wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote: > >>Morten Rodal wrote: > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > >It has improved quite a bi

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Matt
Morten Rodal wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote: Morten Rodal wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. However, the mouse will g

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote: > Morten Rodal wrote: > >On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > >> > >>>It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. > >>>However, the mouse will

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Matt
Morten Rodal wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under bursts of load (i.e. a compile) I h

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-28 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. > > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under > > bursts of load (i.e. a compile) > > > > I

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-27 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very > > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e. > > non-mission-crit

Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-27 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e. > non-mission-critical) use? > It has improved quite a bit lately, an

Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-27 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Hello everyone, I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e. non-mission-critical) use? Regards, Roderick ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o