On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> Are you running seti, rc4, etc? Any programs that sit in the background
> and consume 100% of the cpu?
>
I'm running KDE (using libc_r), and run setiathome and/or dnetc in the
background. I've also tried killing the background tasks, but it makes
litt
On 2003-09-30 02:07 +0300, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:12, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote:
> > > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > >
> > > [.
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:12, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote:
> > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading compli
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> [...]
> > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in
> > > Mozilla Firebird, and when logging out of GNOME 2.4 (
On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
[...]
> > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in
> > Mozilla Firebird, and when logging out of GNOME 2.4 (the 'background
> > fade' animation brings my Athlon XP 2000+
Hi !
> I use the /dev/sysmouse and moused, not quite sure
> why but that's how I've always used my mouse (PS2 or USB) with
> FreeBSD. Could this have something to do with the mouse feeling
> sloppy?
Hmmm, I never used moused and always /dev/psm0 in X.
Still experience the same thing.
Cheers
Pe
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:04:49AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE
On Monday 29 September 2003 07:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote:
> > > Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
> > > >>Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 200
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote:
> > Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
> > >>Morten Rodal wrote:
> > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Sep
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
> > > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is und
On Sunday 28 September 2003 16.40, Peter Kadau wrote:
> Hi !
>
> > > I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CURRENT from 2 days ago, and I experience
> > > the stuttering too.
>
> Me too, though I have to relativize this.
> My configuration is UP with a pentium 4, 2.4 GHz running
> gnome2, evolution, mozilla
Hi !
> > I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CURRENT from 2 days ago, and I experience the
> > stuttering too.
Me too, though I have to relativize this.
My configuration is UP with a pentium 4, 2.4 GHz running
gnome2, evolution, mozilla and some gnome-terminals.
With 4BSD, the mouse cycles through non-r
Il Dom, 2003-09-28 alle 15:45, Arjan van Leeuwen ha scritto:
> > Ahh I tell you the other difference. I had a USB mouse when I tried ULE
> > with 5.1-release and it stuttered. It's just a ps2 one on the current
> > kernel where it's not stuttering.
> >
> > Matt.
>
> I have a PS/2 mouse, I run -CU
> I have not had this experience. Can you give me details of your machine
> and the kind of load that causes slugishness? I'll correct it as soon as
> I can identify it.
Using Linux-Firebird with some Java applets shows this effect, i.e.
completelly bogging down X to a unusable state.
Also, it'
On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote:
> Morten Rodal wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
> >>Morten Rodal wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> >It has improved quite a bi
Morten Rodal wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
Morten Rodal wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
However, the mouse will g
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
> Morten Rodal wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> >>
> >>>It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
> >>>However, the mouse will
Morten Rodal wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under
bursts of load (i.e. a compile)
I h
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
> > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under
> > bursts of load (i.e. a compile)
> >
>
> I
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very
> > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e.
> > non-mission-crit
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very
> experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e.
> non-mission-critical) use?
>
It has improved quite a bit lately, an
Hello everyone,
I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very
experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e.
non-mission-critical) use?
Regards,
Roderick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
22 matches
Mail list logo