Alexander Leidinger writes:
> Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> > I don't have any better idea than ktrace over failing application.
> > Yep, I understand that poudriere will produce a lot.
> Yes, it does. 4.4 GB just for the start of poudriere until the first
> package build fails due to a failed sccache
Am 2024-04-22 18:12, schrieb Gleb Smirnoff:
There were several preparatory commits that were not reverted and one
of them
had a bug. The bug manifested itself as failure to send(2) zero bytes
over
unix/stream. It was fixed with
e6a4b57239dafc6c944473326891d46d966c0264. Can
you please check
Alexander,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
A> I see a higher failure rate of socket/network related stuff since a while.
A> Those failures are transient. Directly executing the same thing again may
A> or may not result in success/failure. I'm not able to
On Apr 22, 2024, at 3:26 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see a higher failure rate of socket/network related stuff since a while.
> Those failures are transient. Directly executing the same thing again may or
> may not result in success/failure. I'm not able to reproduce this at
Hi,
I see a higher failure rate of socket/network related stuff since a
while. Those failures are transient. Directly executing the same thing
again may or may not result in success/failure. I'm not able to
reproduce this at will. Sometimes they show up.
Examples:
- poudriere runs with the
