Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

On 2015-10-13 01:32, White Knight wrote: On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. I have submitted a bug report, with a patch

Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. -- White Knight I'm not from 2ch.net, I just work there.

The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

Hi, Back in 2012, raising the limit of kern.ipc.somaxcann was discussed (now properly called kern.ipc.acceptqueue) but nothing came of it. The old discussion is here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030970.html We are running into problems with the

Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) -a On 9 October 2015 at 00:23, White Knight wrote: > Hi, > > Back in 2012, raising the limit of kern.ipc.somaxcann was discussed (now > properly called