On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:04:16AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
and
On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Are all affected machines multi-processor?
None. Both are i386 UP (although the 4.9-RELEASE box is running an SMP-enabled
kernel).
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Are all affected machines multi-processor?
None. Both are i386 UP (although the 4.9-RELEASE box is running an SMP-enabled
kernel).
On Saturday 29 November 2003 11:43, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I didn't think 4.x SMP kernels could run on a UP machine.
It's a pretty decent Pentium4 Mobo, I guess it meets the requirements for an
SMP-Board running one CPU. From dmesg:
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz
CPU: Intel(R)
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Are all affected machines multi-processor?
None. Both are i386 UP (although
On Nov 28, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
showing odd results (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
the results on a 4.9-PRERELEASE kernel
In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
showing odd results (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
the results on a 4.9-PRERELEASE kernel of Sep 20 14:16:48 ADT 2003 shows:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
showing odd results (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
the
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
showing odd results (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
Lane wrote a quick C program to test
Hello.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
What hardware, kernel configuration, etc? Do you have a misconfigured
ntpd/timed that is manually flapping the time around?
Hardware for the above is a Dual-Xeon, 4Gig of RAM, and about 421
processes running on it
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
and 23:59)
Don't Do That. It will lead to all kinds of trouble that will take
you ages to figure out. Really, ntpd is so ridiculously easy to set
up (especially if you already
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Hardware for the above is a Dual-Xeon, 4Gig of RAM, and about 421
processes running on it currently ... kernel config is at the bottom, but
I don't think there is anything 'abnormal' about it ... and note that I've
had others
On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
and 23:59)
Don't Do That. It will lead to all kinds of trouble that will take
you ages to figure out. Really,
13 matches
Mail list logo
