2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion.
But a change like this is
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and an upgrade to the
2012/11/20 Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used
Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that
Am Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:24:49 +0100
schrieb Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org:
Another question : how did OpenBSD managed this change ?
AFAIK, their users are used to stuff just disappearing or changing.
Remember that pf started as a replacement to ipf and the rulesets had
to be rewritten
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to
On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and
20.11.2012, 18:34, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com:
On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision
On 11/20/2012 10:52 AM, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
20.11.2012, 18:34, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com:
On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com:
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since
On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote:
Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options.
Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
On 11/20/2012 11:51 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote:
Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options.
Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed?
The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com wrote:
The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those who want the new one,
can maintain *it*.
This is beach front property on Fantasy Island. There isn't even enough
manpower to sufficiently support one currently.
--
Olivier,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:24:49PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
O The other question that I haven't seen answered (or maybe even asked), but
O is relevant: what do we gain by going to a later version of pf? I.e. as an
O administrator, what benefit do I get by having to expend
Chuck,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:33:11AM -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
C Why not release pf2 as a port? Then those who want the new pf can use
C it, and those that want the old one can use it.
C
C Or, another option is a knob USE_NEWPF during buildworld will build the
C new pf, otherwise it'd
Forward notice:
I sent this to freebsd-pf originally and did not CC -current, but as the
issue would affect current and the more opinions the better... I have sent
it here too.
-- Cheers, daemon
-- original message
Good day all,
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the
15 matches
Mail list logo
