Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread Tatsumi Hosokawa
At Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:32:39 -0500 (EST), Andrew Atrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 - linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in

Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread Nick Sayer
Ah! I found it! --- linux_ioctl.h.orig Mon Feb 28 11:50:23 2000 +++ linux_ioctl.h Mon Feb 28 11:24:08 2000 @@ -32,6 +32,25 @@ #define_LINUX_IOCTL_H_ /* + * disk + */ +#define LINUX_BLKROSET 0x125d +#define LINUX_BLKROGET 0x125e +#define LINUX_BLKRRPART

Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 01:35:27PM +, Nick Sayer wrote: Ah! I found it! --- linux_ioctl.h.orig Mon Feb 28 11:50:23 2000 +++ linux_ioctl.h Mon Feb 28 11:24:08 2000 @@ -32,6 +32,25 @@ #define_LINUX_IOCTL_H_ This patch is fubar'ed. Your mailer wrapped lines and turned

VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-04 Thread Andrew Atrens
A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 - linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in `linux/include/linux/fs.h': /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is