Hi,
I finally fired this up on an older Intel to test. this is patch 8
from your website:
vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x03 card=0x20e417aa chip=0x2a428086
rev=0x07 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller'
Nope, spoke too soon:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
panic: In GPU write domain
cpuid = 1
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper(c09d59ce,0,c09ad9fe,205,f1ce2938,...) at
db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2d/frame 0xf1ce2908
kdb_backtrace(c0a10b67,1,c82fb835,f1ce29f8,f1ce2998,...) at
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:02:11AM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:03:29PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Use
This is Haswell, right?
Didn't Kib say not interested in haswell testing yet ?
-adrian
On 26 October 2014 14:02, Chagin Dmitry dcha...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:03:29PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:03:29PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Use https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.6.patch. I already have one
private report of the patch worked from
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to my mistake during the patch generation, i915.5.patch is just
a garbage.
Use https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.6.patch. I already have one
private report of the patch worked from person who got the same
Hi,
I can confirm v6 of the patch works for me with a r273559 kernel on a
i5-3320M notebook as well.
Only interesting new output to messages:
Oct 25 23:11:19 kernel: error: [drm:pid1159:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power
management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 0007, was
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
There are more occurences of the bug I fixed once in patch version
On 10/23/2014 15:03, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Use https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.6.patch. I already have one
private report of the patch worked from person who got the same panic
in iicbb.
Yes, this one works (does not panic) and X works! I kldloaded it after
boot as I usually do.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
There are more occurences of the bug I fixed once in patch version 2.
Also, since pmap changes were committed in modified form, please try
the updated patch at
In fact, try
https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.5.patch
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 10/22/2014 08:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
There are more occurences of the bug I fixed once in patch version 2.
Also, since pmap changes were committed in modified form, please
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private)
p *(struct drm_i915_private
On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p *(struct drm_i915_private
2014-10-08 19:05 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private)
I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to
see this piece of data.
For everybody who has the issue with blank screen or
2014-10-07 20:01 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private)
I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to
see this
On 7 October 2014 15:20, Ranjan1018 . 21474...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/sys/amd64/conf/X b/sys/amd64/conf/X
|index 0cd80c6..2d630d5 100644
|--- a/sys/amd64/conf/X
2014-10-07 21:29 GMT+02:00 Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org:
On 7 October 2014 15:20, Ranjan1018 . 21474...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/sys/amd64/conf/X
On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
From the same frame, please do
p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private)
I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to
see this piece of data.
For
20 matches
Mail list logo
