Re: Who is responsible for the install check goo in Makefile.inc1

2003-07-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
[ Moved to -current ] On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:12:09PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: John Birrell wrote: [...] The installworld check for a kernel with the new sigaction promptly core-dumped sh with the unsupported syscall. I think this check should be based on sysctl kern.osreldate, not

Re: Who is responsible for the install check goo in Makefile.inc1

2003-07-30 Thread John Birrell
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:24:42AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I'm regularly upgrading 4.0-RELEASE to 5.x-CURRENT to check that the upgrade path wasn't broken, and this check comes very handy. I wouldn't object though if it was done using kern.osreldate. I'd happily test any patches in this

Re: Who is responsible for the install check goo in Makefile.inc1

2003-07-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:34:01PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:24:42AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I'm regularly upgrading 4.0-RELEASE to 5.x-CURRENT to check that the upgrade path wasn't broken, and this check comes very handy. I wouldn't object though if it was

Re: Who is responsible for the install check goo in Makefile.inc1

2003-07-30 Thread John Birrell
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:37:29AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Sure, that would be a much better (and safer) approach. Could you please send me your code as well, I'm interested in revieweing it. I'd just like to add something like this before Peter's check that runs sh: