Re: atapicam broken by ata_lowlevel.c rev.1.23

2003-11-28 Thread bremner
At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:56:03 -0400, Bremner David wrote: > > /dev/pass0: flushing cache > /dev/pass0: closing track > - [unable to TEST UNIT READY]: Input/output error > Following up to myself again; are we annoyed yet? Anyway, I remember reading about someone trying "burncd fixate" in a simila

Re: atapicam broken by ata_lowlevel.c rev.1.23

2003-11-27 Thread David Bremner
At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:54:53 -0400, Bremner David wrote: > > I have a 5.1-current system of Nov 10, also using rev 1.23 of > ata-lowlevel.c. > > Without atapicam in the kernel, it boots ok. With atapicam in the > kernel it hangs at the messages (written down from the screen) > > (probe2:ata1:0:

Re: atapicam broken by ata_lowlevel.c rev.1.23

2003-11-27 Thread David Bremner
At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:07:30 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Nov 27), Bruce Evans said: > > [Resending due to no response after 2 weeks.] > > > > Rev.1.23 of ata-lowlevel.c broke atapicam on my BP6 system as shown > > by the enclosed boot -v messages (the system just hangs, appa

Re: atapicam broken by ata_lowlevel.c rev.1.23

2003-11-26 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 27), Bruce Evans said: > [Resending due to no response after 2 weeks.] > > Rev.1.23 of ata-lowlevel.c broke atapicam on my BP6 system as shown > by the enclosed boot -v messages (the system just hangs, apparently > waiting for a disk interrupt that never arrives; there see