Re: atkbd_timeout() period?

2022-01-05 Thread Jan Kokemüller
On 05.01.22 06:41, Alexander Motin wrote: > Or may be it can be avoided somehow 20 years later? I'd be super happy if this was removed. On my old laptop I had to disable this code for many years because it lead to hangs in my (non-standard) setup at the time:

Re: atkbd_timeout() period?

2022-01-04 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:39 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:42 PM Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As I see, one of the most active threaded callouts on idle VMware VM and >> some hardware is atkbd_timeout(), called 10 times per second. Plus it >> is also one of few

Re: atkbd_timeout() period?

2022-01-04 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:42 PM Alexander Motin wrote: > Hi, > > As I see, one of the most active threaded callouts on idle VMware VM and > some hardware is atkbd_timeout(), called 10 times per second. Plus it > is also one of few remaining non-MP-safe callouts. According to the > comment it

atkbd_timeout() period?

2022-01-04 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi, As I see, one of the most active threaded callouts on idle VMware VM and some hardware is atkbd_timeout(), called 10 times per second. Plus it is also one of few remaining non-MP-safe callouts. According to the comment it seems to be only a workaround for some lost interrupts. That makes