On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 01:42 Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:38:07PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote:
> > It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise.
> Why not to add trivial cmpset-based implementations to the lacking
> arches ? If maintainers prefer
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:38:07PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote:
> It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise.
Why not to add trivial cmpset-based implementations to the lacking
arches ? If maintainers prefer proper ll/cs assembly, they would
have the time to do it properly
It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise.
-M
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy wrote:
> The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are
> implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in
> review that uses them
The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are
implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in
review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design
issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can
remain part of
