Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzi

2000-01-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-Jan-00 Rod Taylor wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, you wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Rod Taylor wrote: Personally, I'd like to see less stuff in the system source for smaller installs and lower compile time leaving it up to me to customize the individual stuff thats installed. Unless

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzi

2000-01-24 Thread Mike Smith
At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote: The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2. I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate? Zip was selected because it's one of the few compressed bundle formats that allows for

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzi

2000-01-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-Jan-00 Brad Knowles wrote: At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote: The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2. I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate? I did not make the choice personally, I believe that

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzi

2000-01-23 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote: running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing. Its pretty annoying waiting for something to compress if you want to do other things that depend on it being compressed.. --- Daniel

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzi

2000-01-23 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote: running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing. Its pretty annoying waiting for something to compress if you want to do other things