Re: c_caddr_t (etc)

[.] > It's probably a good idea to go easy on the new committers for now > though. Oops, I meant ``to go easy on the *introduction of* new committers''. > > - Jordan > > -- > Brian > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: c_caddr_t (etc)

[.] > To put it in a somewhat larger context, none of the things which have > seen people blow up recently have been all that important, and to get > people freaking out in my mailbox over the -Wall changes or a change > to style(9) is pretty damned silly. This is one aspect to John > Birrell'

Re: c_caddr_t

> > Matt, get over it. bde didn't slam *YOU* in the commit messages. You > > were never mentioned personally. Also, taking your complaint to > > -current is not proper proceedure for handling grievances. > > While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable > considering how

Re: c_caddr_t

> forum. If Matt wished to make this point, he should have done so in a > less inflamitory manner especially in such a public forum. That's > been a problem lately in this forum, and I cannot express easily in > words how strongly I object to it. Fair enough - maybe everyone involved should just

Re: c_caddr_t

In message <86708.917669...@zippy.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable : considering how often Bruce has corrected others for "needless : commentary" in the commit logs and I'd be happy to see everyone follow : their own rules

Re: c_caddr_t

> Matt, get over it. bde didn't slam *YOU* in the commit messages. You > were never mentioned personally. Also, taking your complaint to > -current is not proper proceedure for handling grievances. While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable considering how often Bruce

Re: c_caddr_t

x27;t mind you removing c_caddr_t as long as you also fix the > warnings that it fixed, but it would have been appropriate to notify > me of what you were doing rather then slamming me in the CVS commit > comments. I find that sort of beh

Re: c_caddr_t

In message <199901292317.paa84...@apollo.backplane.com> Matthew Dillon writes: : bde, I don't mind you removing c_caddr_t as long as you also fix the : warnings that it fixed, but it would have been appropriate to notify : me of what you were doing rather then slamming me

c_caddr_t

bde, I don't mind you removing c_caddr_t as long as you also fix the warnings that it fixed, but it would have been appropriate to notify me of what you were doing rather then slamming me in the CVS commit comments. I find that sort of behavior to be highly inapprop