Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> If you make "-D down" the default (as you suggested in a previous message),
> then
> we would be back to having the problem.
To expand on that, if a "-D none" option is added, and "-D down" becomes the
default, then from my personal point of view, that would be
> Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to
> what it was" in
> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html.
>
> Currently in "ps -d -p " -d is not back at what it was.
Yes, back to what it was pre-releng/12.2. The functionality
On 2023-09-19 15:22:49, Ronald Klop wrote:
Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go
back to what it was" in
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html.
Currently in "ps -d -p " -d is not back at what it was.
I meant that it's back to
Van: Michael Gmelin
Datum: dinsdag, 19 september 2023 13:01
Aan: Ronald Klop
CC: ps...@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: changes to ps -d?
On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop wrote:
>
Hi,
In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1].
I could
> On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1].
> I could use "ps axd -p " to see the process tree of some ongoing task.
> In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p
> -D down". Can this become the
Hi,
In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1].
I could use "ps axd -p " to see the process tree of some ongoing task.
In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p -D
down". Can this become the default again? At least when -d is used.
Regards,
Ronald.
[1]
