Re: fdescfs broken?

2003-03-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes: >On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:15:49PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes: >> >The /dev/fd content looks strange: >> >[160]cicely9# ls -al /dev/fd/ >> >total 33 >> >dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel

Re: fdescfs broken?

2003-03-14 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:15:49PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes: > >The /dev/fd content looks strange: > >[160]cicely9# ls -al /dev/fd/ > >total 33 > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 6 16:59 . > >dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512

Re: fdescfs broken?

2003-03-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes: >The /dev/fd content looks strange: >[160]cicely9# ls -al /dev/fd/ >total 33 >dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 6 16:59 . >dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Mar 6 17:00 .. >crw--w 1 ticso tty 5, 1 Mar 14 14:50 0 >crw--w--

fdescfs broken?

2003-03-14 Thread Bernd Walter
The /dev/fd content looks strange: [160]cicely9# ls -al /dev/fd/ total 33 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 6 16:59 . dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Mar 6 17:00 .. crw--w 1 ticso tty 5, 1 Mar 14 14:50 0 crw--w 1 ticso tty 5, 1 Mar 14 14:50 1 crw--w 1 ti