On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> The reason for writing to current@ is
> that I've one box still on r216048,
> where "-c" flag is not required.
> Has there been a recent change to groff,
> affecting this behaviour?
As I recall it, the behavior is also configura
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > BUZI> groff -ms -Tascii try.1 | more
> >
> > ESC[1mSome titleESC[0m
> >
> > How can I get a plain text rendering
> > from a troff document with ms macros?
>
> With n
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > BUZI> groff -ms -Tascii try.1 | more
> >
> > ESC[1mSome titleESC[0m
> >
> > How can I get a plain text rendering
> > from a troff document with ms macros?
>
> With n
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> BUZI> groff -ms -Tascii try.1 | more
>
> ESC[1mSome titleESC[0m
>
> How can I get a plain text rendering
> from a troff document with ms macros?
With nroff, use the -c flag:
nroff -ms -c -Tascii
The groff frontend has a more convoluted s
I'm having problems similar to this thread:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=91536+0+archive/2011/freebsd-current/20110821.freebsd-current
The solution suggested was to use man ./
However, my document is not a man page,
and I use ms macros.
Test document:
BUZI> cat try.1
.TL
Some
