Re: groff and mkdep?

2003-08-02 Thread Peorth
That seems so weird. CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS were set to something in the general environment, for non-port builds, but I thought the FreeBSD make system used for ports and such wouldn't get polluted by simply having that defined as a variable in the env. *headscratch* Maybe just my mistake, but

Re: groff and mkdep?

2003-08-02 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:33PM -0700, Peorth wrote: That seems so weird. CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS were set to something in the general environment, for non-port builds, but I thought the FreeBSD make system used for ports and such wouldn't get polluted by simply having that defined as a

Re: groff and mkdep?

2003-08-02 Thread Peorth
I wasn't running make with -e. I believe the commandline was similar to 'make -DNO_KERBEROS -DNO_WERROR buildworld', and never saw miscellaneous switches passed. So, yeah, it worked only after I unset CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for that session's environment. Like I said, I'm generally new to this. Not

groff and mkdep?

2003-08-01 Thread Peorth
I've just started to try and sync up to -CURRENT, and my first time asking on the lists, and everything seems to be going fine, except groff's build dies with rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a

Re: groff and mkdep?

2003-08-01 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:48:07PM -0700, Peorth wrote: I've just started to try and sync up to -CURRENT, and my first time asking on the lists, and everything seems to be going fine, except groff's build dies with rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a