H. I'm not sure why this reinvents a lot of the wheel in the
already existing iso.1 target. Could you explain its purpose a little
better as well as why you didn't simply conditionalize the iso.1
target in some way if it didn't currently suit? As it is, we have
two targets now and that
From: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: iso target in release/Makefile
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:34 -0700
It is part of a patch set I sent you for review.
And that patch looks good - please commit it and then merge the
resulting changes into RELENG_4 if you get the chance
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
H. I'm not sure why this reinvents a lot of the wheel in the
already existing iso.1 target. Could you explain its purpose a little
better as well as why you didn't simply conditionalize the iso.1
target in some way if it
From: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: iso target in release/Makefile
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:43:16 -0700
You didn't MFC the iso.1 target. We are all building releases on
RELENG_4 right now :-) (-current releases have been broken for quite a
while). Thus my patch was developed
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:15:20PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
You didn't MFC the iso.1 target. We are all building releases on
RELENG_4 right now :-) (-current releases have been broken for quite a
while). Thus my patch was developed on RELENG_4 and only committed to
current so I
